Europe Extreme Elite

Ok i finally got it stable at 3445.7 MHz (all four cores).

Problems were:

1. Extreme dust inside graphics card cooler (that i didn't see before)

2. Memory controller can't do more than 420MHz when used with Quad core (but can do 460MHz with Dual core for some unknown reason)

3. CPU Volt drop was a little high but then i fixed it.

All settings in quake 3 are on high, anistropic filtering is at 16X.. @ 1280x1024.

 

Comparison:

dude, 6->333<- fps pretty sexi, you sexi slut.

Now take draw fps for us in Crysis with MAX on Crysis with MAX resolution, plz, i wanna see!

Is that only possible on 2003 server?
what mobo do you have?

its not dependant on os, more likely what graphics card it is, since quake 3 wont probably use sli im guessing a single 8800ultra card or one of those radeon (did i spell it right?) graphics thingies they do/make.

i tried upto com_maxfps 2000 and it did reach that but the d/c is insane thats with an 8800gts non overclocked, the same quad core as spc, but stock settings, (4 x 2.4ghz)

 

oh monkey, windows server 2003 dusnt have dx10 i dont think, all recent cards play crysis maxed out (dx9 mode), and at 4 x 3.4ghz core (even 4 x 2.4), the cpu will never be the bottleneck.

My system:

 

PSU: 550W LC Power

Motherboard: MSI 975X Platinum PowerUp Edition

                       Intel 975X Express Chipset

Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.4457GHz

                        382FSB x 9.0 (default it runs on 2.4GHz)

RAM: 4GB CEON DDR-2 800MHz

Graphics Card: Radeon X1950 PRO 512MB

Disks: Three Seagate Baracuda 7.200 800GB (320GB+320GB+160GB)

Writers: YAMAHA CD-R F1, Optiarc DVD-RW 7173A

SoundBlaster: Creative SoundBlater Live! Platinum with front panel

Network Card: Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port Server Adapter

OS: Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition R2 SP2

 

Windows XP can't use 4GB of ram and also XP doesn't have optimizations for 4 cores because XP was intended for use with 2 processors max.

 

Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition on the other hand doesn't have any limits because this is the higest end operation system from microsoft

that supports 128GB of ram and 32 processors (this is for x86 32bit) for 64bit version of datacenter you'll get 1 Terabyte of memory support and 64 processors.

 

I think that OS makes a hudge difference when compared to XP (for home use)... here's more:

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/datacenter/default.mspx

 

Yes, Windows Server 2003 doesn't have DX10 support and i will never use DX10.. because vista sucks like hell.

It's also been said that DX10 cards are slower on DX9.0c software than pure DX9.0c graphic cards.

 

 

Oh my fucking god !!! (sorry for being impolite but... OH MY FUCKING GOD AGAIN !) What a config. I feel so little suddenly.

But my config isn't so ugly...



My actual config :







And my future config :

haha awesome.

 

way 2 laggy =)

Imagine, the 360° videoprojector solution with the PC of SPC

are you fucking sickkkkkkkkk, where you get the fckn money

And, why do you overclock so much a so expensive system ??? Are you mad ? You work for NASA ?



I can imagine easily that your spc sound system is costing a lot of resources, to rebuild videos. But guy, be carefull with your hardware !



Little indiscreet question : is your sound system popular ? Do you succeed well while selling it ? Of course I hope so, because you have surely worked very hard on it, and because you're friendly too.

Well processor wansn't that expenssive ... it cost me 230€.

But now that i overclocked it value of my processor is like 1600€..

and ram was 16€ per 1GB..

 

Everyone needs that :